All posts by Ecofintech | admin

Libertarian Municipalism: Networked Cities as Resilient Platforms for Post-Capitalist Transition. – Kevin Carson

[english] [castellano]



We live in a time of terminal crisis for centralized institutions of all kinds, including the two most notable members of the genus: states and large corporations. Both a major cause and major symptom of this transition is the steady reduction in the amount of labor needed to produce a given level of output, and consequently in total aggregate demand for wage labor. This shows up in shrinking rates of workforce participation, and a shift of a growing part of the remaining workforce from full-time work to part-time and precarious employment (the latter including temporary and contract work). Another symptom is the retrenchment of the state in the face of fiscal crisis and a trend towards social austerity in most Western countries; this is paralleled by a disintegration of traditional employer-based safety nets, as part of the decline in full-time employment.

Peak Oil (and other fossil fuels) is creating pressure to shorten global supply and distribution chains. At the same time, the shift in advantage from military technologies for power projection to technologies for area denial means that the imperial costs of enforcing a globalized economic system of outsourced production under the legal control of Western capital are becoming prohibitive.

The same technological trends that are reducing the total need for labor also, in many cases, make direct production for use in the informal, social and household economies much more economically feasible. Cheap open-source CNC machine tools, networked information and digital platforms, Permaculture and community gardens, alternative currencies and mutual credit systems, all reduce the scale of feasible production for many goods to the household, multiple household and neighborhood levels, and similarly reduce the capital outlays required for directly producing consumption needs to a scale within the means of such groupings

Put all these trends together, and we see the old model of secure livelihood through wages collapsing at the same time new technology is destroying the material basis for dependence on corporations and the state.

But like all transitions, this is a transition not only from something, but to something. That something bears a more than passing resemblance to the libertarian communist future Pyotr Kropotkin described in The Conquest of Bread and Fields, Factories and Workshops: the relocalization of most economic functions into mixed agricultural/industrial villages, the control of production by those directly engaged in it, and a fading of the differences between town and country, work and leisure, and brain-work and muscle-work.

In particular, it is to a large extent a transition to a post-capitalist society centered on the commons. As Michel Bauwens puts it, the commons paradigm replaces the traditional Social Democratic paradigm in which value is created in the “private” (i.e. corporate) sector through commodity labor, and a portion of this value is redistributed by the state and by labor unions, to one in which value is co-created within the social commons outside the framework of wage labor and the cash nexus, and the process of value creation is governed by the co-creators themselves. Because of the technological changes entailed in what Bauwens calls “cosmo-local” production (physical production that’s primarily local, using relatively small-scale facilities, for local consumption, but using a global information commons freely available to all localities), the primary level of organization of this commons-based society will be local. Cosmo-local (DGML = Design Global, Manufacture Local) production is governed by the following principles:

  • Protocol cooperativism: the underlying immaterial and algorithmic protocols are shared and open source, using copyfair principles (free sharing of knowledge, but commercialization conditioned by reciprocity)
  • Open cooperativism: the commons-based coops are distinguished from ‘collective capitalism’ by their commitment to creating and expanding common goods for the whole of society; in Platform coops it is the platforms themselves that are the commons, needed to enable and manage the exchanges that may be needed, while protecting it from capture by extractive netarchical platforms
  • Open and contributive accounting: fair distribution mechanisms that recognize all contributions
  • Open and shared supply chains for mutual coordination
  • Non-dominium forms of ownership (the means of production are held in common for the benefit of all participants in the eco-system.

In this paper, we will examine the emerging distributed and commons-based economy, as a base for post-capitalist transition, at three levels: the micro-village and other forms of cohousing/co-production, the city or town as a unit, and regional and global federations of cities.

Download PDF

Libertarian Municipalism: Networked Cities as Resilient Platforms for Post-Capitalist Transition

La Idea de la Revolución en el s. XIX – P. J. Proudhon

[cast] [en]




Descargar PDF

Descargar EPUB (zip)

En toda historia de una revolución se tienen que observar tres cosas:

  1. El régimen anterior que la revolución trata de abolir y que en su afán para conservarse se hace contrarrevolucionario.
  2. Los partidos que, tomando la revolución desde ciertos puntos de vista, siguiendo preocupaciones e intereses diversos, se esfuerzan, cada uno, por atraerla hacia sí y por explotarla en su provecho.
  3. La revolución en sí misma, o su solución legítima.

La historia parlamentaria filosófica y dramática de la revolución de 1848, podría dar materia para muchos volúmenes; pero me circunscribiré a tratar, de una manera independiente, algunas
de las cuestiones que permiten ilustrar nuestros conocimientos actuales. Me lisonjeo que mis estudios bastarán para explicar la marcha, y hacer conjeturar el porvenir de la revolución en el
siglo XIX.

Lo que voy a trazar no es una historia, sino un plan especulativo, un cuadro intelectual de la revolución.
Llenad el tiempo y el espacio con fechas, nombres, discursos, manifiestos, proclamas, batallas, episodios, golpes de habilidad, evoluciones parlamentarias, venganzas, desafíos, etc., etc., y
tendréis la revolución en carne y hueso; tal como se ve en Buchez y en Michelet.

Por primera vez el público juzgará el espíritu y conjunto de una revolución antes de que se realice por completo: quién sabe las desgracias que hubiesen evitado nuestros padres, si, dejando aparte el azar, los hombres y los partidos, hubiesen podido leer con anterioridad su destino.
En mi exposición tendré cuidado de recurrir en lo posible a los hechos y elegiré siempre entre estos los más sencillos y vulgares: es el único medio para que la revolución social, que no ha sido hasta aquí más que un Apocalipsis, se convierta en una realidad.

Toward An Open Co-operativism: A New Social Economy Based On Open Platforms, Co-Operative Models And The Commons

by Pat Conaty and David Bollier

“The power of open source principles, now proven beyond a doubt, is rapidly proliferating into many other areas of culture, production and social life.  The prospect of more participatory, socially convivial forms of production – accountable to communities and mindful of the larger common good – has never seemed more achievable.  Still, there are important organizational, legal and financial hurdles to overcome – not to mention cultural and political differences – that must be dealt with if co-operatives are to find common ground with digital commoners and peer producers.  Fortunately, there are emerging models such as multi-stakeholder cooperatives that could be vehicles for such cooperation.”


Continue reading Toward An Open Co-operativism: A New Social Economy Based On Open Platforms, Co-Operative Models And The Commons